Working Together to Find a Voice: Recommendations for Voice Healthcare Based on Expert-By-Experience and Practitioner Consensus.

OBJECTIVES: Voice care services aim to provide effective and meaningful voice care. Current practice guidance recommends a multidisciplinary voice care approach, supported by the evidence-base and practitioner experience. However, unlike other areas of physical and mental health, current voice care guidance does not explicitly include the voices of experts-by-experience, meaning those who have lived experience of voice difficulties. The perspectives of those working within nonclinical voice professions, such as vocal coaches, are also often omitted. There is therefore a need for updated practice guidance which prioritizes expert-by-experience and nonclinical perspectives. METHODS: Vocal Health Education hosted a consensus meeting in London, UK. The meeting was coproduced with experts-by-experience, and attendees included those with lived experience of voice difficulties and practitioners across a range of disciplines within voice care. The content of the meeting was synthesized into themes and associated recommendations were drafted and agreed to by all attendees. RESULTS: The consensus statement offers practical advice to those working in voice care. Recommendations are offered for multidisciplinary and biopsychosocial voice care, with a focus on person-centered practice and the valuing of lived experience. Through discussion, consensus was reached regarding recommendations for voice care assessment and treatment, practitioner approach, psychosocial considerations, and service design. The need for greater expert-by-experience involvement, coproduction, and co-construction was emphasized throughout. CONCLUSIONS: This report emphasizes the voices of those with lived experience. It highlights ways of updating or improving current care, with the aim of informing clinical practice as well as research and service development. The consensus statement is the first in voice care to include experts-by-experience at the center of its recommendations, underlining the need for more coproduced and co-constructed research and practice within voice healthcare.

Estimation of the global prevalence and burden of obstructive sleep apnoea: a literature-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of published data on the global prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea, a disorder associated with major neurocognitive and cardiovascular sequelae. We used publicly available data and contacted key opinion leaders to estimate the global prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase to identify published studies reporting the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea based on objective testing methods. A conversion algorithm was created for studies that did not use the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) 2012 scoring criteria to identify obstructive sleep apnoea, allowing determination of an equivalent apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) for publications that used different criteria. The presence of symptoms was not specifically analysed because of scarce information about symptoms in the reference studies and population data. Prevalence estimates for obstructive sleep apnoea across studies using different diagnostic criteria were standardised with a newly developed algorithm. Countries without obstructive sleep apnoea prevalence data were matched to a similar country with available prevalence data; population similarity was based on the population body-mass index, race, and geographical proximity. The primary outcome was prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea based on AASM 2012 diagnostic criteria in individuals aged 30-69 years (as this age group generally had available data in the published studies and related to information from the UN for all countries). FINDINGS: Reliable prevalence data for obstructive sleep apnoea were available for 16 countries, from 17 studies. Using AASM 2012 diagnostic criteria and AHI threshold values of five or more events per h and 15 or more events per h, we estimated that 936 million (95% CI 903-970) adults aged 30-69 years (men and women) have mild to severe obstructive sleep apnoea and 425 million (399-450) adults aged 30-69 years have moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnoea globally. The number of affected individuals was highest in China, followed by the USA, Brazil, and India. INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to report global prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea; with almost 1 billion people affected, and with prevalence exceeding 50% in some countries, effective diagnostic and treatment strategies are needed to minimise the negative health impacts and to maximise cost-effectiveness. FUNDING: ResMed.

Compliance after switching from CPAP to bilevel for patients with non-compliant OSA: big data analysis.

Introduction: For patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) who are initially non-compliant with continuous (automatic) positive airway pressure (CPAP/APAP) therapy, a bilevel PAP (Spont/VAuto) therapy transition pathway is available to improve therapy adherence. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare PAP therapy usage data of patients with non-compliant OSA (ncOSA) on CPAP/APAP who were switched to bilevel PAP. Methods: A PAP telemonitoring database was queried between 1 January 2015 and 31 July 2016 for eligible patients started on CPAP/APAP and non-CMS (United States Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) compliant and switched to bilevel PAP within 90 days of starting CPAP/APAP therapy. PAP therapy data on all patients were compared before switch (CPAP/APAP) and after switch (VAuto/Spont). Results: Of the 1496 patients with ncOSA identified, 30.3% used CPAP, 62.3% APAP, and 7.4% both APAP and CPAP before switching to a bilevel mode. 47.8% patients switched to Spont mode and 52.2% to VAuto mode. PAP usage significantly improved by 0.9 h/day (p<0.001) and all other device metrics (residual apnoea-hypopnoea index and unintentional mask leak) also improved after the switch. No patients had achieved US CMS criteria for compliance before the switch, and 56.8% did after. Conclusion: This shows for the first time that there may be potential benefit from switching from CPAP/APAP to bilevel PAP for patients struggling with PAP adherence.